
Catherine Delahunty: “The refusal to look at our collective identity as Pākehā, and the collective benefits we accrue from colonisation, holds us in a position of dominance. But under that, I sense growing discomfort from those who’ve never reckoned with what it means to be Pākehā in this land.”
We’re in the midst of another Pākehā backlash, writes Catherine Delahunty — and it’s up to Pākehā of goodwill, the well-informed and open-hearted, to step up and challenge it.
So many times lately, I’ve been told that talking about racism by Pākehā against Māori is itself racist.
“I’m not a Pākehā, I’m a Kiwi,” I’m told by people who also lament that “we never used to notice race.”
Now, though, the media is full of what happened on the anti-co-governance tour and what the mayor of Invercargill said about it, and unhappiness about equity measures in the health system. Then we had two wāhine Māori politicians on the front page for nothing — the Wellington mayor who forgot to pay for dinner until the next day, and the Minister of Justice who took leave to be a parent in the holidays.
Why is there such a soft landing for racism right now? Is it the election? Or is it just the persistent underlying intolerance that has always been simmering below the surface of our communities and our politics? One step forward — and then backlash, on repeat.
I’ve noticed that doing anything to stand up to breaches of Te Tiriti and racism against Maōri is immediately labelled as racist against white people. Doing these things is seen as destroying “unity”.
The more subtle commentary says thing like “I love Māori culture but . . .” and “We must help Māori be successful”.
But we hardly ever talk about ourselves as Pākehā. Even naming Pākehā as the dominant group among many other cultures living here seems taboo.
The national narrative I was raised on was benign invasion. Other Indigenous peoples around the world had it far worse under their colonisers, this narrative goes, so what have Māori got to moan about? Instead of colonisers, we had brave founding settlers.
I think of the waterfront memorial in Nelson, where one of my ancestral names is listed among the “pioneering families”. Another is also described in the library archives as a “pioneer” family.
Pioneer is a wonderful neutraliser of coloniser. It evokes courageous adventurers risking all to start a life in an empty wilderness where they gallantly work to build a new world. The word is used to invoke our gratitude for their sacrifice.
At primary school, I was in Wakefield House and to mark this we wore a blue ribbon. We knew nothing about the person the ribbon signified, Edward Gibbon Wakefield, except he was some kind of founding hero, particularly of Wellington where we lived.
Every sports day, we sat in the prickly grass of Magpie Lawn in the Botanical Gardens in bright summer heat and waited in lines to run races. I remember the starter pistol bangs and the sudden gasping race in which I was always slower than when running in the street at home. I was proud to be in Wakefield as the blue ribbon was beautiful.
I’ve since learned that Wakefield was a speculator and a liar. His company — the New Zealand Company — led by himself, his brothers and his son, acquired land cheaply or illegally from tangata whenua and sold it on to potential migrants.
If you read Jerningham Wakefield’s books Adventure in New Zealand Vol 1 and Vol 2, you’d think the Wakefields were doing tangata whenua a massive favour and all was lovely until the ungrateful hapū fought back and stopped agreeing to land deals.
We recently visited the site of what is known as the Wairau “affray” where Arthur Wakefield and others attempted to arrest Te Rauparaha and others, to appropriate the rich rolling lands of the Wairau Valley. The signage there still says that the New Zealand Company “needed” this land for British settlers, although someone has written “wanted” above that.
No wonder we’re still unable to accept positive change to rectify past wrongs, when our official history is so sanitised and inaccurate. No wonder we want “unity” as a blanketing word to cover up how harm was done.
The contradictions in our present are multiple. As Pākehā, we see ourselves as a fair people who nonetheless took a country via a rip-off. We are courageous fighters overseas who have benefited from a dirty war at home. We are proud of our Treaty but we accept its daily dishonouring. For individuals, there is a plaintive confusion: “I’m a good person and I’ve never stolen anything.”
The refusal to look at our collective identity as Pākehā, and the collective benefits we accrue from colonisation, holds us in a position of dominance. But under that, I sense growing discomfort from those who’ve never reckoned with what it means to be Pākehā in this land.
At the same time as ingrained racist attitudes are being publicised and perpetuated, these things are also being named and the attitudes behind them challenged like never before in the colony.
What are our shared values as Pākehā, and how do they manifest in what we actually do, not just in what the media claims we do?
There are now so many Pākehā of goodwill, who are better informed and more open-hearted, that we must be able to answer that question — and we must be able to step up to the challenge.
Right now, there’s an atmosphere that validates direct and damaging racist behaviour. The roots are deep and the attitudes bloom whenever social conditions allow.
But the values we admire as Pākehā, of tenacity and courage, can be reframed to suit where we are now — the tenacity to unpack the past, the courage to embrace a different future.
It’s up to us Pākehā who’ve benefited from Tiriti education to share what we know with our own and to continually challenge ourselves in the work for Tiriti justice.
We can move past the backlash. It’s on us Pākehā to make sure that happens.
Catherine Delahunty is a Pākehā activist in environmental, social justice, and Te Tiriti o Waitangi issues. She is a writer and a tutor on social change issues, and a grandmother. Catherine was a Green MP for nine years and lives in Hauraki.
Thank you for reading E-Tangata. If you like our focus on Māori and Pasifika stories, interviews, and commentary, we need your help. Our content takes skill, long hours and hard work. But we're a small team and not-for-profit, so we need the support of our readers to keep going.
If you support our kaupapa and want to see us continue, please consider making a one-off donation or contributing $5 or $10 a month.
As a Pakeha 73 year old female I have worked with the public and subtle racism happens frequently. I am now calling out mainly older white men (their wives say nothing) and I love the reaction and surprise at me, middle class white lady, questioning their appalling comments. Having been married to my lovely Maori man for 55 years, we have seen it all. Followed around shops, terrible hurtfulremarks, and so much more. Well now I’m pissed off and I’m calling them out. We are the ones who know because until these people know you are in a mixed marriage they haven’t a clue so they let RIP thinking you will agree with them but I don’t. So time for action. A lawy told me 55 years ago that Maoris can be your friends but you dont marry them! Well I did and I wish he was alive to tell him how happy I am. NZ is a racist Country. Marlborough and all the country south is bad for subtle and lately confronting racism. We love Wellington. It’s the least racist place and we of mixed marriage always feel welcome. Thank you
Tēna koe e Catherine, tēna koutou katoa.
I have long wondered at the “west is the best” mentality until I started teaching Classics at highschool.
The assumption that the west is the best by many colonisers just floors me given the “origin” of democracy which was for elite men, by elite men.
Women were men’s property. Elite men lazed around “philosophising” about how they were naturally more capable of intellectual engagement and leadership while their young wives diligently looked after their family and the slaves looked after the property and made their masters richer.
Exploitation was the norm. This is the foundation of western “civilization”? Why didn’t we grow western values out of the Persian Empire where women were mothers, entrepreneurs, and warriors.
Where is the humility? Where is the ability to think critically? We don’t mind appropriating the Arabic number system, algebra, the scientific method or or grand basilica architecture from the “East”, but admit that ideas brought home from the Middle East after the ‘Crusades” brought Europe out of the Dark Ages? Fat chance!
Tāngata whenua built my ancestor’s house on their land, and nursed his wife back from death. Grace and understanding are the two key values that continually radiate through from tangata whenua from the time of my ancestors, to Debbie Ngawera Packer in response to the lido lady who was dragged out of an anti cogovernance meeting with someone shouting to pull her pants down.
Wow that’s western civilization? And “anti cogovernance” is a thing? Really? How absurd to women to not be included in decision making. Being included is a given in the 21st Century.
Why is it that elite men need stone monuments to commemorate founding a city? Oh yes because Greek men loved their male heroes who gave themselves a name before they died. How boring. Founding a city on stolen land is not civilised and nor is murdering people that have been dehumanised to justify the land grab.
No abused woman can “move on” in a relationship until there has been a serious sincere effort to demonstrate remorse and a desire to earn trust. A “one law for all” approach when the law absolutely favours the colonisers is like law in ancient Greece which only favoured elite men.
The foundation of western “civilisation” needs to be scrutinized. Was it fair? To what extent does the injustice of ancient Greek society manifest today?
Disregarding, disrespecting, eye-rolling and laughing at women as co-decision makers is intolerable yet calling in/out racism towards Maori is worse than being racist because it makes privileged people feel bad? That’s sick. It’s UNCIVILIZED.
By most of society’s standards, it is UNACCEPTABLE to condone demeaning, humiliating behaviour towards women.
It is UNACCEPTABLE to treat Tangata Whenua with such condescending, dehumanising disregard.
I am sorry that being treated like a human being is called privilege, but until I listened to Dr Moana Jackson on You Tube, I had no idea how oblivious I had been to the degrading and dehumanising treatment Maori systemically suffer.
I don’t want any added privileges to the ones I’ve already got.
I am honoured to learn to be truly Pākehā. We have always been welcome in this land.
Humility leads to healing and moving forward. Jesus taught all his followers to be humble towards everyone. Humility means being willing to listen and learn from someone different to us. It means we might realise there is another piece of the puzzle we hadn’t previously considered.
We can’t move forward as a nation until we Pākehā start practising humility as a whole. We are deeply hurting our Treaty Partners who were already recognised by the Crown as a sovereign nation through He Whakaputanga signed by King William IV.
No one is trying to steal your Pākehā house.
Māori offer a gracious hand of invitation to make decisions together. Look at Parihaka. When the army rolled up, Maori offered food to the soldiers on a peaceful Sunday of worship to those who raped, burned and murdered their people in return.
Surely we as Pākehā can learn from that, and this time accept their grace, yes and forgiveness, and understanding as as been reiterated in responses to the sad, volatile fear-filled hearts which has resulted in disgusting dehumanising behaviour.
Let’s seek humility and care enough to listen.
Ngā mihi