I’ll admit that I’ve been a Māui fan-girl for a long time. What’s not to love about the archetypal trickster of Polynesia?
Despite colonisation and missionary moralising, the stories about Māui live on. In classrooms across the country, Māui still slows the sun, steals the secrets of fire, and continues to try to cheat death between the legs of a woman.
The odds were against Māui, right from conception. He was never supposed to survive. Māui was the youngest. The weakling. The runt. The stillborn who was given up for dead by his mother, and released into the ocean to his fate. I like to imagine that his mother, in absolute crisis, and bewildered by a premature and stillborn child, wrapped his remains in the most sacred and tapu part of her — her top-knot — and gracefully let go of something she had no capacity to fix, giving it up to the universe.
Inevitably, Māui-Tikitiki-a-Taranga (Māui of the top-knot of Taranga) is found, magically, by the perfect person to teach him all the tricks he will need to save the world, survive the onslaught of his murderous brothers, and fish up new lands. Including the one I live on, Te Ika-a-Māui, the great fish of Māui. Yes, it’s a wee bit more evocative and imaginativethan its other name: the North Island.
Growing up in Aotearoa, we heard a bit about the exploits of Māui-Tikitiki. But I had to dig a lot deeper into old Polynesian Society journals and order books from the offsite storage units of university libraries to find out anything about Māui from my own Tongan culture.
In typical we-can-do-better Tongan style, I learned that we have three Māui. The youngest of which is Māui Kisikisi, son of Māui ‘Atalanga, son of Māui Motu’a (old Māui). In a country where humility, deference, and obedience to elders and people in power are prized as quintessentially Tongan, Māui Kisikisi remains an important stubborn and defiant exception. His very existence opens up a small window of permission to architects of civil disobedience and troublemakers everywhere.
In Samoa, Māui is called Ti’iti’i, the son of Talaga. He dares to wrestle powerful Mafuie in the underworld and emerges victorious, able to share the secret knowledge of fire with everyone, bringing all people the pleasure of cooked food.
Around the academic kava circles (and the kava circles where people just drink too much and talk) there are wonderful conspiracy theories afoot, especially about Māui slowing the sun.
The symbol of the sun has always been synonymous and interchangeable with the supreme rulers of ancient (and not so ancient) Polynesian kingdoms. Some armchair anthropologists, and some real ones, suggest that the story of Māui catching, beating up, and slowing the sun, so that people could have more time to work and rest from dawn to dusk, holds within it the mythologised memory of a great revolution — of Māui defeating a despot ruler, and orchestrating a rebellion that gives power back to the people.
In the story of how Māui fished up the island of Tonga, he caught the wandering eye of a wife who was so charmed by Māui’s attention she gave away the secret of the hook that could fish up land to please him. Bested and cuckolded, the great chief Tonga insisted that, in return, the first island Māui fished up be named after him.
Again, anthropologists — armchair and otherwise —suggest that the hook is a metaphor for the astronomical knowledge required to navigate an otherwise unknown ocean. It’s perhaps no coincidence that the constellation Scorpius has been known for centuries in this region as the great fishhook of Māui.
The point is, that for century upon century, a plethora of peoples — he appears in at least 17 different Pacific languages — have all given a collective crap about Māui. All over Oceania we have named stars, cities, giant stone sculptures, landmarks, beaches, and islands after him. Our stories about Māui helped us make sense for centuries of morals, mortality, land, death, power, fire, mana, authority — and who and what you can be in this world, regardless of birth. He has featured in story, symbol and song. He is both demigod and ancestor.
And, unlike the fictive character of Moana, Māui is not an imaginative blank slate for Disney to create.
So when the good folks from Disney serve us up Shrek of Polynesia as a comedic slapstick sidekick that talks to the tetchy tattoo on his nipple, there’s going to be a bit of pushback.
Here is this great more-than-a-man who has overcome so many odds, not by birthright, but by cunning, cleverness, and trickery. Someone who we have named stars after! And here is Disney serving up a pot-bellied, barrel-chested man-baby, with eyes too close together, pupils perfectly aligned with his widespread nostrils in nice savage symmetry. Here is an oafish, neckless wonder with large lips and an ooga-booga mask-like mouth. Our great hero has more in common with the cartoon fare of the hunchback of Notre Dame, more affinity with the Beast than any Beauty.
I’m watching the brown incredible hulk and his ginormous frame jump up and down with a club (or is that a fishhook?), spitting out a curiosity of familiar Polynesian words (did he just say “boo ya?”). And I’m left with the same reaction as the unimpressed Moana in the trailer. For real?
Some politicians have quickly jumped on the Māui-critique waka complaining that creating an obese character sends the wrong message to a population that is struggling in the 21st century with an obesity epidemic. Diabetic amputations, shorter life expectancy, these are very real problems that the Pacific population is battling with. The top seven fattest countries in the world are from the Pacific. In Aotearoa, almost one third of Pacific kids are obese and two-thirds of adults are. It’s a thing.
People close to me have dedicated their whole careers to trying to do something positive about obesity in the Pacific population. One of the strategies is to draw on a heritage where barely anyone was overweight, because they were so active and the diet was so healthy.
But that pride in the active past just got messed with. When Disney’s weighty character jumps on this waka, the balance is definitely tipped. Is it fair to make Māui look like he’s eaten too many cheeseburgers, when technically Elvis hasn’t even left the building yet?
One columnist came out spewing tacks that by raising concerns about obese Māui, we were in the perilous waters of fat-shaming a cartoon. To be fair, I think when it comes to a juggernaut like Disney putting the first PI male character on the big screen who isn’t a volcano, but a beloved demigod, and is still the size of a volcano, you’re allowed to complain out loud about this.
But, how weird to have us complaining about body size. The shoe is most definitely on an unfamiliar foot. And more than a little bit of my heart broke when I read this analysis from the blogger Louise Afoa: “I’m looking forward to seeing Moana on its Boxing Day New Zealand release, finally my own Disney princess. But judging by popular opinion, my fat brown body will never and should never represent a Pacific goddess.” Ouch. That hurt in the way that every little Pacific Island girl saw Cinderella and knew that shoe would never fit.
We in the Pacific have, against the tide, equated big with being beautiful for a very, very long time. But there is something so relatively healthy about the way we do big, that Japanese scientists coined the term “healthy obese” after studying Tongans. Using existing BMI standards, Jonah Lomu at his peak fitness would have been considered obese. When you think about the PIs in the All Blacks, Valerie Adams and her brother Steven, we can make it in triple-XL and it looks pretty damn attractive.
So, yes, we break the rules and the scales when it comes to size. Yes, it’s also a public health problem. And yes, we come from a cultural context that has very little practice at fat-shaming.
And yet, still, there is something that made us — not all of us, but enough of us — feel ashamed of Disney’s Māui.
Would it have been that hard to recreate a demigod that made its living descendants yell “boo-ya” just as loud as the Rock? A friend confessed to me, “Was it because I knew that Dwayne the Rock Johnson was voicing Māui that I expected him to be hot?” I, too, expected that Māui would be beautiful. Not a stick figure thin blond Prince Charming beautiful, but beautiful in the way that so many of our men effortlessly are.
The six-pack was not a requirement for my viewing pleasure, although every picture of every hero that I have ever seen my sons draw includes a strange lumpy little grid around the belly. “Mum,” my 12-year-old said in all seriousness. “Every story about Māui says that he is strong. He should have a six-pack and abs.” What can I say? They grew up in the Age of Ultron. It’s part of the superhero package.
What they didn’t grow up in was in the age of Māui on the big screen. Once, I would have thought that was sad. But maybe having him left to our imaginations was not such a bad thing. After Boxing Day, there will be no kid on the planet that imagines Māui without the Disney cartoon beating his coconut chest in the background.
Appearance matters. It matters that the Poly girls are finally going to get someone with more South Pacific sun on her skin than a Snow White English rose. So to create the first “Pacific Islander” male superhero character that my Tongan son eye-rolls about and disassociates from is not a win. He’d rather be Captain America.
All of us create stories of ourselves out of existing stories. We don’t make them up by ourselves. This is why Māui has always mattered. And it’s why Disney’s Māui matters. When it comes to children and young people, Disney is the Goliath of the big screen in every room of almost every house, shaping the hearts, minds and expectations of generations.
The white elephant in the room is that almost all the Disney characters are white. It doesn’t matter so much how you frame and name a character, when you’ve got a plethora of different to choose from and you are free to identify through who you want. None of them will stick to your skin, culture or identity in ways that you don’t want them to.
For us “ethnic minorities” though, the stakes are higher. A whole cohort of young Pacific people will grow up with the Disney incredible hulk Māui and his neckless Poly-Shrek representing the greatest demigod adventurer of our culture. They will get the super-savage that’s built like a Big Mac, shaking his big hook and talking back to his dancing nipple tattoo.
The Disney heavyweight Māui will cast a wide, long and triple-XL shadow over every image that’s preceded him and every Māui to come. And there is no doubt that he will become a part of the bits and pieces that our young boys use to make sense of who they are and what they are capable of in the world.
If there’s one thing I know from being exposed to my Pacific culture, it’s that beauty is found everywhere, regardless of size. Laughs go a long way. But mana trumps all. It’s not so much about whether Māui is fat or not. It’s also about whether he has mana — that’s smarts, courage, integrity, heart, and a little bit of cunning.
Given that we’ve only seen the trailer, let’s hope Disney’s Māui still has a few tricks up his sleeve.
Thank you for reading E-Tangata. If you like our focus on Māori and Pasifika stories, interviews, and commentary, we need your help. Our content takes skill, long hours and hard work. But we're a small team and not-for-profit, so we need the support of our readers to keep going.
If you support our kaupapa and want to see us continue, please consider making a one-off donation or contributing $5 or $10 a month.
When I watched the movie I
When I watched the movie I didn’t think Maui looked fat or obese. I thought he looked muscular and strong. Like a barrell/tank like body. Big but not flabby.
It’s not like they made a
It’s not like they made a movie about MLK and cast a white guy in the lead role. These characters and their sources are all fictional. People need to get over this. It’s just a movie.
This kind of nitpicking about
This kind of nitpicking about children’s cartoons is why people hate liberals and their excessive need to be politically correct. How about letting a few things go because it’s just a cartoon?
I didn’t see Māui as fat at
I didn’t see Māui as fat at all! He looked strong. Someone capable of pulling islands out of the sea. He looked like men in lifting competitions (not that of bodybuilders who while look aesthetically pleasing can actually be really weak). It’s a shame your sons rolled their eyes at him. Not all superheroes need a visible six-pack. And if we’re going with the Avengers comparison Māui seemed a cross between having the strength of Thor, the sarcasm of Tony Stark, and the mischief of Loki. I can understand Disney’s Māui may have upset people of Polynesian descent but I don’t think Disney was aiming to malign Māui. They probably saw the existing princesses and princes and their lack of body type diversity and wanted to do something about it. They can’t make him live up to a thousand people’s different interpretations of him; they had to choose. Their intention wasn’t evil. People worried about the negative impact it might have need to go and spin it positively. Have discussions about how obesity is bad for your health but their ARE different body types and being “big” does not equal obese. People who see Disney’s Māui as big and immediately equate that as being unhealthy are the ones who are off. Everyone is beautiful and Disney’s Māui is a strong guy with a big body. I think he’s beautiful.
Fun fact: Māui’s design was based off the Rock’s Samoan grandfather. So no, he’s not derived from Shrek (and I disagree with any comparison). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhMRs-lICsI
And then the last sentence of
And then the last sentence of this article turned out to be completely correct, Disney’s Maui turned out to be defined by his strength of body and character alike and not at all by his weight, and Moana turned out to be one of the best movies of the year and one of the best Disney movie’s of all time.
It’s nice to get a happy ending every once in a while.
Wonderful insights!
Wonderful insights!
No one has quite mentioned that one of the things that might have influenced the design of Maui (note that he is not fat but actually broad and muscular (as noted by a Samoan comic book artist elsewhere online) without the modern style of hyperdefinition like bodybuilders)… is that he is going on an expedition with a teen girl. Perhaps they wanted a more fatherly/teacherly image (as well as a somewhat comedic one) than a hot potential romance look (no romance for this heroine, I hear! yeay! So tired of that story. Glad to see a girl hero being a hero without needing a boy to save her).
For the rest of us, this is the introduction to a culture, a set of mythology, Maui, the sailing and navigating skills that brought Polynesians into the vast Pacific before our Vikings ancestors stopped hugging the shoreline. It’s a bit dangerous to judge the whole thing from the trailers… though I am intrigued, and with the likes of the Rock and Te Vaka and others, I hope this gets millions of kids and adults alike researching the real myths, the real cultures and the real wayfinders. And other Maui stories and depictions.
Hoping Maui really does have some wonders up his sleeve…
Its a pointless way to prove
Its a pointless way to prove a point. It is clear that the large caricature of Maui as depicted in this movie, is either designed to humiliate our culture or that these production team just loves to mock us polynesians. Why a huge Maui is beyond me. Why not a smaller medium sized person? Thats sufficient. Did Duane had any part in the production, and if so, how much input did he put in? Did he not understand that the depiction of the Maui we know is distinctively different to what he knows? Did he consult other Polynesian experts on this production?
This is incredible. I will never encourage my grand kids to watch depiction of Maui in the context it is produced.
Awesome! Great Read
Awesome! Great Read
Great read!
Great read!
firstly I am a maori male,
firstly I am a maori male, Disney seems to have done a fair representation of a character, why rounded. because a curved figure is more accepted to the eye then a hard edged fiqure. secondly Polynesian people we may think we are all toned and stuff, but we are not we are a fat over weight people.
This is the kind of critical
This is the kind of critical brave writing that pacific communities should have about pacific representations – and by the divided comments it’s doing exactly that – hitting on the chords of truth and contradiction. I agree Disney got it wrong.
I am Tongan and I am annoyed
I am Tongan and I am annoyed by this portrayal of Polynesians as big umpha loomphas! Polynesians are obese because of the dang unhealthy and unwanted food imported (or dumped) into our society. When I grew up on the islands in the 40’s, everyone around me skinny. Skinny but strong and well-defined because of our low-meat diet. We worked in the bush and were healthy, probably as were most people around the world. Food was pure and natural therefore we were pure and natural.
Shame on the “Rock” for not having any sway on this. There are some obese polynesians, but that’s not the majority. My son is 6’2″ and about 190lbs. He’s strong and healthy as I was growing up on the islands. His uncles on his my side and his mother’s side are the same. There are six polynesian boys in his high school and they are all about the same size. The norm is what he is. Since birth, he’s always been at 85 percentile or off the charts, but his pediatrician said nevermind that because the charts are based on the averager caucasian child and that my son was just fine. The norm for polynesian is not the Valeri or Steve Adams. They are that size due to their father’s genes (and he’s European).
What I am saying is that this Shrek of a Maui degrading. Some white person some where probably saw and huge poly somewhere and asked, “Dang! what nationality is that guy?” And when they were told he’s Tonga or Samoan, that’s where the stereotype developed. He didn’t notice the 20 other average sized polys next to “Shrek” cause he was just amazed with the one. haha I dont know where this is headed but I dont have time to edit. Just throwing it out there. Grab it and make sense of it. haha
Anyway, forget this Moana and especially the Rock for not standing up for our people of Oceania’s Maui! He goes and portray’s someone else’s myth (Hercules) and keeps that image, but destroys our Oceania myth by allowing others to bring in “Shrek” in his place. Well money is in his eyes and he’s an American anyways. Me, my children and grandkids are going to boycott this “Poly Princess-Shrek” movies for sure. Hope all people with Oceania blood do too!
I have to agree with you on
I have to agree with you on this. Maui is a rotund stereotypical brown side kick. My complaint is that they would never portray Poseidon or Hercules or Zeus in such an way, so why should we accept a oversized frizzy haired fatty who looks like he was run over by a couple of hundred firestone tires! I have friend who is working on the music for this movie but I am disappointed that we get the short end of the stick.
Instead of supporting, your
Instead of supporting, your comments on its own are sarcastically putting down our culture, like I’ve never thought of watching Cinderella and thinking that my feet will never fit, seriously this whole historical chit chat comes up to what are you trying to say? Because from what I gather your comments are more against you.Disney did not say that YOU implied that. My loving humorous full of life uncles are about Maui size and No I don’t care if my feet fit those glass slippers, I prefer a Sun kissed tan dark flowing hair Sinilau to whisk me home in his canoe as we watch the SunSet.
Karlo this made me cry….
Karlo this made me cry…..Inasmuch as hope is not a strategy the only answer to Disney’s distortions are to (re)create our own. Māui is one hot adolescent with a six pack and magic fingers that spark fires. If any of his tātau speaks its his peʻa wrapped around his large you know what lol ʻofa atu and mālo ʻaupito for always raising the word to keep up the fight. mana moana!
I think Carlo Mila has made
I think Karlo Mila has made some very valid points about the influence of art and theatre or movies on the younger generation, responsibly reinforcing cultural truth, accuracy and authenticity. Disney has to be more culturally aware as everything should be today. That’s civilisation and moving forward. Don’t tell Mila to lighten up please because playing God in a movie is not the same as the Maui character. Please, not everything, has to be seen with and from westernised eyes.
As a big fan of Karlo Mila
As a big fan of Karlo Mila this review is gutting. I’m big, brown, poly, apparently an oafish with eyes hurrendously ugly w ooga booga fat lips (the same fat lips handed down to me by my ancestors) and a savage nose spread half way across my face that stretches out even wider when I smile or laugh. There’s a heap of us that don’t have a sharp pakeha looking nose or little lips with a dainty chin. I think this smacks of some internalised racism (that alot of us hold brown folk hold) but please don’t reinforce western beauty standards on us all.
Yah, I’m offended. For myself, my ‘ooga booga savage like’ ancestors and my full lipped brothers (and sisters).
Guh.
Fetu, I want to say to you
Fetu, I want to say to you that I’m bummed out that this article had this impact. I’m criticising a caricature made my Disney and I can’t see that any of the proportions on that cartoon could be achieved in real life without plastic surgery. It was the mathematical impossibility of the features that pissed me off. I know what the ooga booga savage trope looks like. Peter Jackson does it well in many of his movies. I don’t meet those people in real life, cos nobody in my mind, actually looks like that. This is my point. This is not about my internalised racism, it’s about somebody else’s. I get it why it would upset you and I apologise to you for a combination of words that comes off inconsiderate and uncomplimentary. That’s stink. But I have never looked at anyone in real life and thought that their lips were too full or that they looked ooga booga. Crikey. One look into the photo album of my life – my family, my lovers, my friends – would put that to rest. Sorry for not being more careful about how I put that across or thinking about my own hafe kasi privilege in the way that I wrote that. Quite frankly, I think we are a seriously, relentlessly beautiful, beautiful people – and that’s what annoys me about this representation.
I only saw a beautiful, big,
I only saw a beautiful, big, brown Māui in the trailer for Disney’s ‘Moana’. I recognised him instantly as a representation of a Pacific man endowed with the genes of his ancestors – not so much a “incredible hulk Māui and his neckless Poly-Shrek”. Reading this, I feel sad for my Poly brothers, with all their mana and Poly-swag, eyes-to-close, no-neck, brown and Shrek-like who have been degraded by your comments.
on the contrary, I felt the
on the contrary, I felt the writers’ comments were to use words that are available and which which have been used – largely by scholars of cultural studies – to critique the distortions that often are made about black and indigenous peoples. She didnʻt invent the lexicon, sheʻs utilising it to make the point that Disney has not done justice to depart from the historical tradition of imperialists to caricaturise and exaggerate body parts to achieve connotative racialised value. Ask any scholar and theyʻll see what Mila’s doing – sheʻs doing important deconstructive work. Sorry its nuance lost on a couple of the readers.
Word! This is so on point!
Word! This is so on point!
By comparison,a succession of
By comparison,a succession of actors (and actresses) including comedic Jim Carrie playing God,have in no way altered my perceptions and beliefs in that deity,perhaps we need to lighten up a little.